Well President Trump like you I wait for all the evidence to be in, and well now it is. You are without a doubt America’s Twithead and Chief. It should have been obvious given your twitter addiction.
But the real proof is when you somehow blamed “both sides” when a shithead white supremacist drove a car into people walking and carrying signs. He killed three Americans and injured several more. And yes he clearly fell threatened but not by clubs but rather simply that these people believed in a free and equal America for all races. Clearly he was scared by Americans with a different point of view.
By the way it’s a pretty big clue when David Duke thanks you and strokes your ego. Maybe you and he should get a room. Perhaps then he can explain the history of these groups terrorizing your fellow Americans.
We should also call it like it is, driving a car into people to stop them from protesting is terrorism. So as a reminder in addition to being our twitched and chief you are also president and should protect all Americans from terrorism, Just so you know this includes protecting black and brown Americans from shithead white terrorists. Perhaps you can get your balls back from David Duke and actually do something about this.
A Madman has spoken….
Well here we are after the election, and no matter who won you were going to end up with half the country with a huge pit in their stomach wondering what went wrong why did the other side win. And the other half breathing a sigh of relief. But no matter what side you we’re on the world is not coming to and end. Of that I am relatively sure…
But having these elections where we have such a polarizing feeling portraying total destruction by either side is a real problem. We really need an election where we feel like multiple candidates could do the job are running for. There are a few real problems in our elections:
One is a natural tendency people to want to gather tougher and support “their team” no matter what. Basically we don’t have political parties that represent policy opinions, we have “teams” that we rally around. Unfortunately given our American tenacity in pursuing winning at all costs we eat ourselves alive. Rather than looking at how to make the country and American’s thrive we get caught up in brining the other team down. And losing sight of the fact that “other team”, well it is made up of another set of Americans.
Making this tendency worse is how money gets used in politics. Money itself isn’t the issue, but that the vast majority gets spent in ad campaigns. Ad campaigns by their nature are trying to find the most effective way to get one candidate / team to win. Trying to present what the issues are, weigh multiple points of view and pick the best option is simply too long, tedious and uncertain for a political campaign, It is far more effective to tie your candidate / team to a brand and make it a right / wrong choice. So basically money in politics today is trying to make us all stupid…
Finally money in politics today has gone dark. The biggest problem I see with the Citizens United Ruling is not how much money is allows to flow into politics its that is misses the very important difference between free speech and money. When I speak out on a subject you know it is me speaking, even if I use a megaphone. But now people can “talk” via money and leave no trace.
We simply need to find a way to counteract this and work toward real information, discussion and debate on what is best for our country.
A Madman has Spoken…
Well its that joyous voting season today. A time where we get to make our opinions heard but at the same time somehow feel powerless. Its a time when many Americans seem determined to throw away their privilege to vote.
Well in case you are looking for effective ways to toss your option out the window here are three suggestions…
- Simply don’t vote, probably the most popular due to use ease. In fact this is often the goal of candidates. They know if they can get some parts of the populace not to vote they have a better chance of winning. Basically this method guarantees the opinion of those who do vote get more weight. So if you really want to protect the interest of older white people this should be your preferred method!
- Vote, but don’t get informed. By the way ads and rallies don’t count, as they are designed to simply sway you by the most effective means possible. And giving you real information is way too time consuming to be effective. Voting without really knowing where the candidates stand and what they would really do in office is giving your opinion over to random chance, the biggest star or the biggest spender.
- Finally a savvy way waste your vote is to only vote for someone you think can win even when you really prefer another candidate. So after getting yourself informed and actually voting you’re choosing NOT to let your actual opinion known. It is hard because as an American I know I want to WIN… But that is not what voting is for. Voting is a chance to let your voice be heard. If any candidate gets more than a few percentage points they get noticed and over time the policies and characteristics that get votes become adopted. A reminder it may have taken 108 years but the cubs did win again, so maybe give an Independent, Libertarian on Green a chance…
If your objective is not to waste your vote then do your best to be informed. Try to find real policy information. There are a growing number of sites out the to help such as: https://votesmart.org, http://maplight.org, or http://votersedge.org. Once informed then simply show up and cast your vote for whoever you truly think is best person to do the job for your community, state or country.
A Madman has Voted…
While we all know Trump could beat any conspiracy. Trump’s maybe right about such a conspiracy out to stop him. I was doing a little bit of research and there is very strong evidence that a small group of 63,060,041 American voters is out to prevent him from becoming President.
But I was equally shocked when I found out that there is also a conspiracy trying to stop Hillary. And this conspiracy has 51,794,094 voters. Dong a bit of math I can see why Donald would see this as rigged. Why how can it be right when more voters support Hillary than him.
But maybe there is another name for not getting as many voters to back you in a democratic election….
Who owns Trump? Of course Trump would say Trump owns Trump, not beholden to anyone. But as as he has told us his wealth is built on “excellent” deal making. I’m guessing he doesn’t only deal with himself… So the question is who does Trump deal with? Because whoever they are his wealth depends on them.
Given the international reach of his deals Trump’s own wealth could be coming from foreign nations such as China or Russia. In a normal election we as Americans would know more about any candidates dealings via their tax returns. While other candidates have provided their tax returns Trump has continued to withhold his. While tax returns are an important way for too for Americans to know more about him as a candidate he keeps coming up with excuses for not telling us.
I have no way to know if he has something to hide. Or if the fact his wealth depends on other is something he doesn’t want to remind us of. But I’ve been involved in enough deals myself to know when someone avoids sharing information, they think it will hurt them. Without the tax returns we simply don’t know who owns Trump. Maybe we should care…
A Madman has spoken….
I realize you respect the capability of Russian hackers. But before you ask for Russian help I’d asking the US FBI first. They have been very effective art retrieving previously detailed emails, either by recovering them directly from the server or rebuilding them from the inevitable trip emails leave.
In fact the FBI is so adept at doing this that they’ve already done so. As mentioned in the FBI Director’s details on the investigation they recovered and rebuilt the deleted emails. I don’t think they need help from Russia but I’m sure they appreciate you looking after them…
All the best,
The Political Madman
I sit here in a bar eating a light dinner, imagining a convention season will be interesting, illuminating maybe even a bit humorous. But somehow it always manages to just be a time when the naiveté of my patriotism gets massacred.
I believe strongly in a system where the different points of view held by Americans that all love our country can focus on real problems. I know well enough that posturing and politics and blow hards all work to get our attention. And the conventions are the blow hardest moments for all the blow hards in our political process.
I long for a convention that focuses on identifying the challenges before us and weighing who the differing points of view really compare. One where a platform that inspires all of us. But this takes talking about the myriad of approaches and really understanding many of then have merits. But instead we get a bunch of people talking as if there are only two points of view and that somehow their “opponent” is crazy, corrupt, incompetent, self-absorbed, or just simple buffoonery. At both major conventions it my longing simply won’t matter.
The fact of the matter is we are all Americans, we all share this country its burdens and its benefits. We are a strong country but only if we always work to make our politicians work to focus on what they can do rather than who they can take down. But in the end the conventions are what they are and will try to make America weaker…
A Madman Has Spoken…
We’re already getting to the point where Brexit is old news, except for the part where no one knows what’s really going to happen…
In reality there is no way to predict if the vote was the right or wrong thing for the UK. To be honest it’s just the starting point. The outcome depends far too much on really hard work simply not yet done. And after that work is done it actually might not have mattered which way the vote went. So when Mr Trump praised Boris Johnson for having “got it right” on Brexit he was well, … let’s call it “confused”.
Its an all too common confusion, simply mistaking winning for “getting it right”. In a democracy this confusion is really important to understand. It is simply a tool that pundits use to validate their narrative, sadly showing complete disregard far what is actually best. The real damage is the overconfidence in a simple election result which stops critical thinking and working toward better solutions. Especially in a case like this where the “right” answer really is a path yet to be worked out.
We all want to have our point of view prevail. But no matter how happy or sad we are after an election it is vital to always look for the better path forward after those results come in. Because while there is often not a simple right or wrong answer there is always a way to make things better. But making things better requires cutting through the BS….
A Madman has spoken…